Core Capability

Mitigation plans that actually unlock funding — not just sit on a shelf.

A FEMA-approved Local Hazard Mitigation Plan is the entry ticket to HMGP, BRIC, FMA, and most state-level mitigation funding. Without one — or with one that's expired — your jurisdiction is locked out. Fenix EM builds plans that get approved, get adopted, and produce a project pipeline you can actually fund.

What's Included

Approved & Adopted Plans

  • Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP)
  • Multi-jurisdictional plans
  • FEMA & state review support
  • Risk & vulnerability assessment
  • Funded project pipeline
  • Benefit-Cost Analysis support
Who This Is For

If your plan is expired — or you've never had one — you're already losing funding cycles.

Public Sector · Primary
01

Cities, Counties & Tribal Governments

Local governments and tribal nations whose LHMP has expired, is approaching the five-year update, or never existed. Without a current FEMA-approved plan, eligibility for HMGP and BRIC is gone — and so is access to the largest mitigation funding in the federal portfolio.

02

Special Districts & HOAs

Water districts, school districts, fire protection districts, and homeowner associations facing wildfire, flood, or other natural-hazard exposure. Special-purpose governments are often eligible mitigation grant applicants but rarely have plans in place to qualify.

03

Multi-Jurisdictional Programs

County-led plans covering multiple municipalities, regional programs, and tribal consortia. Multi-jurisdictional plans are cost-effective and politically complex — we manage both the technical work and the stakeholder coordination.

Private Sector
04

Critical Infrastructure Operators

Utilities, healthcare campuses, large industrial sites, and other critical facilities pursuing public-private mitigation partnerships, FEMA Public Assistance hardening projects, or insurance-driven mitigation documentation.

05

Property Owner Coalitions

Master-planned communities, large commercial property portfolios, and resort properties facing wildfire, flood, or seismic exposure — coordinating with local jurisdictions to participate in approved mitigation plans and unlock matching-fund opportunities.

The Funding Landscape

A current plan unlocks roughly $2 billion annually in federal mitigation funding.

Approval of a FEMA-recognized hazard mitigation plan is the gate — without it, your jurisdiction is ineligible for the major federal mitigation grant programs. Below are the four most common funding pathways the plan opens.

HMGP

Hazard Mitigation Grant Program

Post-disaster mitigation funding triggered by Presidential Major Disaster Declarations. The largest mitigation funding source historically — funds projects that reduce future losses from the same hazard type.

Cost share: Typically 75% federal / 25% non-federal · Plan required: Yes
BRIC

Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities

Annual pre-disaster mitigation grant program focused on infrastructure projects, nature-based solutions, and capability-building. Highly competitive but accessible to communities with current plans.

Cost share: Up to 75% federal (90% small / impoverished) · Plan required: Yes
FMA

Flood Mitigation Assistance

Annual program funding flood mitigation projects for properties insured under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Targets repetitive-loss and severe-repetitive-loss structures.

Cost share: Up to 100% federal for SRL · Plan required: Yes (NFIP participation also)
PA 406

Public Assistance — 406 Mitigation

Mitigation funding tied to Public Assistance projects after a disaster. Allows hardening of damaged facilities beyond pre-disaster condition. Often overlooked but substantial.

Cost share: Standard PA cost share · Plan required: No (but plan accelerates approval)
Methodology

The work, in three phases.

Every mitigation planning engagement follows the FEMA Local Mitigation Planning Handbook structure — risk-based analysis, stakeholder-informed strategy, and a project pipeline that can actually be funded.

01Assess

Risk & Vulnerability Assessment

Quantitative hazard analysis grounded in authoritative data — NOAA, USGS, FEMA NRI, state climatology — combined with vulnerability assessment of critical facilities, lifelines, and at-risk populations. This phase produces the analytical foundation the entire plan rests on.

Typical timeline: 6 – 10 weeks
Deliverables
  • Hazard identification & profile
  • Risk & vulnerability assessment
  • Critical facility / lifeline inventory
  • Loss estimation modeling (HAZUS where applicable)
  • Repetitive-loss property analysis
  • Capability assessment
02Strategize

Mitigation Strategy & Project Pipeline

Mitigation goals and objectives, action prioritization, and a defensible project pipeline that maps directly to grant program eligibility. Stakeholder workshops surface community priorities; technical analysis ensures projects can be funded.

Typical timeline: 6 – 10 weeks
Deliverables
  • Mitigation goals & objectives
  • Prioritized action list
  • Project pipeline mapped to grant eligibility
  • Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) support
  • Stakeholder & public engagement
  • Plan maintenance protocol
03Approve

Review, Adoption & Submission

Plan goes through state review, FEMA review, and local adoption. We manage the review cycle — responding to FEMA review comments, addressing crosswalk findings, and supporting local jurisdiction adoption resolutions. Approval is the only outcome that matters.

Typical timeline: 4 – 8 weeks (plus state/FEMA review time)
Deliverables
  • Final plan document
  • FEMA crosswalk completed
  • State review response & revisions
  • FEMA review response & revisions
  • Local adoption support
  • Approved Pending Adoption (APA) coordination
How to Engage

Three ways to start.

Engagement scales to whether you need a single-jurisdiction update, a new plan, or a multi-jurisdictional effort. Most jurisdictions begin with the plan currency review.

Why Fenix EM for Mitigation Planning

Plans that get approved — and produce a fundable pipeline.

Most mitigation plans fail one of two tests. They either get rejected at FEMA crosswalk because the risk analysis is hollow — or they pass approval and then sit on a shelf because the action list isn't actually fundable. Fenix EM builds plans designed to clear both bars.

The methodology is grounded in authoritative data. The project pipeline is built around real grant eligibility. And the principal has been on the receiving end of these plans during actual deployments.

  • 1

    Authoritative-data risk methodology

    Hazard analysis grounded in NOAA, USGS, FEMA NRI, and state climatology — the same approach we apply to THIRA work. Crosswalks pass because the underlying analysis is defensible.

  • 2

    Grant-eligible project pipelines

    Action lists designed to map cleanly to HMGP, BRIC, FMA, and PA 406 eligibility — not aspirational lists that look good in the plan but can't actually be submitted for funding.

  • 3

    FEMA Adjunct Instructor depth

    Active FEMA Adjunct Instructor credentials. Plans align to the current Local Mitigation Planning Handbook because we teach the doctrine federally.

  • 4

    Field-tested under actual disasters

    Sixteen years of deployments — Kerrville, Helene, Milton, Hawaii, COVID. Mitigation plans that reflect how disasters actually unfold, not how the planner imagines they will.

Common Questions

What jurisdictions actually ask.

Below are the questions that come up most often in pre-engagement conversations. If yours isn't here, the discovery call is the right place for it.

How long does a hazard mitigation plan take to complete and get approved?
Single-jurisdiction plans typically run 9 to 14 months from kickoff to FEMA approval. Multi-jurisdictional plans run 12 to 18 months. State and FEMA review cycles add an additional 3 to 6 months on top of the active engagement — that time is largely outside our control. We manage the review responses, but the review queue itself is the rate-limiting step.
Our plan expires next year. Are we already too late?
Not necessarily — but you're tight. A standard update takes 9 to 14 months including review. If your plan expires in less than 12 months, we typically scope an expedited update that leverages existing analysis where defensible and rebuilds where the underlying data has changed. Worth a discovery call now rather than later.
Can mitigation planning costs be funded through a grant?
Yes — and most mitigation plans are, in fact, grant-funded. HMGP, BRIC, FMA, and HMA all fund plan development costs as eligible activities. We can structure engagements to align with grant cycles, and the plan currency review (Tier 1) will identify the funding pathway most appropriate for your situation.
Do HOAs and special districts actually qualify for mitigation grants?
Special districts — yes, often, especially water districts, fire protection districts, school districts, and similar special-purpose governments. HOAs are more constrained — they typically participate as sub-applicants under a parent jurisdiction or pursue mitigation through alternative pathways (state programs, insurance-driven mitigation, or property-owner coordination with local jurisdictions). The Tier 1 currency review identifies which path applies to your situation.
What's "Approved Pending Adoption" and why does it matter?
When FEMA reviews and approves a plan, it's marked "Approved Pending Adoption" (APA) — meaning the plan is technically sufficient but not yet effective. The participating jurisdiction(s) must formally adopt the plan via resolution within one year of FEMA approval. APA coordination is part of the Tier 2 and Tier 3 engagements because adoption mistakes can invalidate the whole approval.
Do you do Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) for individual projects?
Yes. BCA is required for nearly all mitigation grant applications and is a common reason projects fail at the application stage. We provide BCA support as part of plan development for priority projects, and as a standalone service for jurisdictions with approved plans pursuing specific HMGP or BRIC applications.
Our risk is mostly wildfire — can we focus on that hazard?
A FEMA-approved LHMP must address all hazards that can affect the planning area, but depth of analysis can be calibrated to risk. For wildfire-dominated jurisdictions, the wildfire hazard profile gets the deepest treatment, with proportional analysis for secondary hazards. The plan still has to be comprehensive, but it doesn't have to be uniformly deep.
What if our jurisdiction never had a plan in the first place?
Common situation, especially for tribal nations, special districts, and small municipalities. Starting from scratch is straightforward — same methodology, slightly longer timeline because there's no existing analysis to leverage. The advantage is that you build the plan the right way from day one rather than retrofitting around a hollow predecessor document.
Next Step

A discovery call is the right starting point.

Thirty minutes, no pitch deck, no contract pressure. We talk through what plan you have (or don't), what hazards are driving the conversation, and what funding cycles are in play. If a plan currency review is the right next step, we'll discuss it. If not, you'll leave with a clearer view of what to do next.

Prefer to start smaller?

Download a Fenix EM diagnostic — both surface mitigation status as a domain. Free, immediate.

Municipal Preparedness Audit (PDF) → Business Continuity Risk Snapshot (PDF) →